Sora 2 vs VEO 3: An Objective Comparison for Real‑World Use (with Prompt Tips)
2025/10/03

Sora 2 vs VEO 3: An Objective Comparison for Real‑World Use (with Prompt Tips)

A practical comparison of Sora 2 and VEO 3 based on public demos and write‑ups, plus scenario‑based guidance and prompt strategies.

References: dev.to, Skywork, Scalevise comparisons (linked below). Validate with your own samples.
Try now: Text‑to‑Video | Image‑to‑Video

TL;DR

  • Both are strong next‑gen video models with long‑form consistency and better controllability.
  • Observed tendencies from public material:
    • Sora 2: stable physical plausibility (occlusion/reflections/cloth/fluids) and natural long shots;
    • VEO 3: crisp commercial sharpness and confident handling of high‑contrast materials and faster motion.
  • Always A/B on your assets; availability/pricing depend on your provider.

Dimensions That Matter

  • Physical realism: Sora 2 often feels smoother on occlusions/reflections/volumetrics; VEO 3 emphasizes edge clarity and clean highlights.
  • Long‑form consistency: both improved vs early models; Sora 2 feels especially natural in continuous moves.
  • Controllability: both respond well to cinematography terms; Sora 2 reacts reliably to camera+physics cues; VEO 3 is friendly to clean commercial framing/sharpness.
  • Style coverage: both broad; Sora 2 for cinematic realism; VEO 3 for product‑centric, high‑contrast looks.
  • Throughput/cost: queue and quota dependent—benchmark with 10–20 samples.

Prompt Patterns (Text‑to‑Video)

  • Sora 2 (physics + camera)
Rainy city at night; handheld steady, 35mm shallow DoF, low‑angle slow push;
Backlight + neon reflections, slight haze; photoreal, cool cinematic grade;
Rule of thirds, foreground lamppost passes; end on freeze; 16:9.
  • VEO 3 (commercial clarity + materials)
{Product} on seamless gray set; steady or slider slow push;
Side + rim light, natural metallic highlights and glass refraction;
Clean commercial style, cool tone, high contrast; right‑side negative space; end on logo close‑up; 16:9.

Image‑to‑Video Tips

  • Sora 2: prioritize subject consistency; use text for camera/motion (slow push/orbit/steady).
  • VEO 3: emphasize material keywords (highlights/refraction/reflections) plus clean commercial grading.

How To Test on Our Platform

  • Open Text‑to‑Video or Image‑to‑Video.
  • Pick aspect and paste a template.
  • First pass short to validate direction.
  • A/B by changing a single variable (lighting/camera/composition).
  • Need a specific model pipeline? Contact support to enable what your plan provides.

QA Before Publish

  • Logo/edges stable;
  • Highlights/reflections free of popping (add volumetrics/rim/steady camera if needed);
  • Pacing steady;
  • USP appears in 1–3 seconds with caption space reserved.

Further reading:

  • dev.to: Sora‑2 vs VEO‑3
  • Skywork: Sora‑2 vs Gen‑3 vs VEO
  • Scalevise: Google VEO‑3 vs OpenAI Sora‑2

Get started: Text‑to‑Video | Image‑to‑Video